3D Printed Food: Potential Risks and Benefits

I’ve seen countless food trends come and go. But 3D printed food? That’s a whole new ballgame and one that has me seriously concerned. Did you know that researchers are already printing complex food structures using ingredients like chocolate, dough, and even vegetables? (Derossi et al., 2024) While some hail this as the future of nutrition, my years of experience and commitment to natural healing have me raising a skeptical eyebrow. Let’s see why this futuristic technology might not be the panacea it’s cracked up to be.

3D Printed Food–The Allure of Personalized Nutrition: A Double-Edged Sword

Table of Contents

In my 75 years on this earth, I’ve seen countless nutrition fads come and go. But 3D printed food? That’s a whole new level of technological intervention that makes this old herbalist’s head spin. At first glance, the idea of customized nutrient profiles sounds like a dream come true. Imagine, they say, a world where every morsel you eat is tailored to your exact nutritional needs. It’s a seductive promise, isn’t it?

But let’s take a step back and look at this with the wisdom that comes from decades of working with herbs and observing nature’s intricate balance. The reality of personalized nutrition through 3D printing is far more complex – and potentially problematic – than it appears.

Key Takeaways

3D printed food offers personalized nutrition but raises significant concerns about nutrient loss and disruption of natural food synergies.
The additives and processing required for 3D food printing may compromise nutritional integrity and introduce potential health risks.
There’s a critical lack of long-term studies on the health impacts of consuming 3D printed foods, particularly for those with chronic conditions.
Traditional food preparation methods, including herbal wisdom, often enhance nutritional value in ways that 3D printing can’t replicate.
The technology behind 3D food printing may further disconnect consumers from the natural origins of their food and neglect crucial micronutrients.
The wise woman approach emphasizes embracing time-honored herbal wisdom and maintaining a connection to nature through our food choices.
While 3D printing offers innovative possibilities, it should not replace a diverse diet of whole foods and herbs, which offer superior bioavailability and holistic nourishment.

Customized nutrient profiles: promise vs. reality

Proponents of 3D printed food argue that we can create meals perfectly matched to an individual’s nutritional requirements. In theory, this could help address specific health concerns or optimize performance for athletes (Derossi et al., 2024). However, our understanding of human nutrition is far from complete. We’re still discovering new interactions between nutrients and the human body. How can we possibly program a printer to account for the intricate dance of phytochemicals, enzymes, and micronutrients that occur in whole foods?

Moreover, the technology itself has limitations. As Derossi et al. (2024) point out, “Achieving consistent quality in 3D printed foods is challenging due to the variability in food materials. Inconsistent texture and nutrient availability can affect the overall healthfulness of the product” (p. 5). This inconsistency could lead to nutritional imbalances over time, potentially doing more harm than good.

The risks of over-engineering our food

In our quest to create the “perfect” meal, we risk losing sight of the holistic nature of nutrition. Food is more than just a sum of its nutrient parts. Traditional cuisines evolved over thousands of years, with combinations of ingredients that work synergistically to nourish our bodies. When we start tinkering with this delicate balance, we may inadvertently create new problems.

For instance, 3D printed foods often rely heavily on additives to achieve the desired texture and printability. These additives, while necessary for the printing process, may not contribute positively to our health. As Derossi et al. (2024) note, “The extensive use of thickening and gelling agents (e.g., starch, gelatin, carrageenan) to ensure printability can dilute the nutritional profile of the final product” (p. 2).

Why nature’s wisdom trumps technological interventions

As an herbalist, I’ve always believed in the power of whole, natural foods. Nature has spent millennia perfecting the nutrients in plants, and our bodies have evolved alongside these foods. When we start breaking down foods into their component parts and reassembling them through a printer, we lose the complex interactions that make whole foods so nourishing.

Consider the humble dandelion leaf. It’s not just a source of vitamins A and K; it contains a myriad of compounds that work together to support liver health and digestion. No 3D printer could replicate the subtle balance of nutrients and phytochemicals found in this “weed” that grows freely in our backyards.

Furthermore, our connection to food goes beyond mere nutrition. There’s a joy in preparing a meal with fresh, whole ingredients – a satisfaction that can’t be replicated by pushing a button on a printer. This connection to our food, to the earth, and to the rhythms of nature is an essential part of holistic health that technological interventions often overlook.

Additives and Artificiality: A Recipe for Concern

As a seasoned herbalist, I’ve always advocated for the purity and simplicity of whole foods. The rise of 3D printed food, however, presents a concerning shift towards artificiality that goes against everything I’ve learned in my 75 years. Let’s see why this trend has me worried about the future of our nutrition.

The reliance on thickening agents and preservatives

3D food printing technology, while innovative, comes with a significant catch: it often requires a hefty dose of additives to make food “printable.” These aren’t the natural thickeners our grandmothers used, like arrowroot or agar from seaweed. We’re talking about a cocktail of synthetic agents that would make any herbalist’s hair stand on end.

According to Godoi et al. (2016), “The printability of a food material is highly dependent on its flow properties and the way it solidifies after deposition” (p. 52). To achieve this, manufacturers often resort to using a variety of thickening agents and stabilizers. These can include everything from modified starches to cellulose derivatives and various gums (Sun et al., 2018).

But it doesn’t stop there. To ensure these printed foods have a shelf life beyond a few hours, preservatives often enter the mix. As someone who believes in the life force of fresh, whole foods, the idea of consuming something designed to resist natural decomposition is deeply troubling.

How processed ingredients compromise nutritional integrity

When we start breaking down whole foods into their component parts for 3D printing, we’re not just changing their form – we’re fundamentally altering their nutritional profile. This process can lead to significant losses in vital nutrients and beneficial compounds that nature packaged together for a reason.

A study by Derossi et al. (2018) found that “The extensive use of thickening and gelling agents (e.g., starch, gelatin, carrageenan) to ensure printability can dilute the nutritional profile of the final product” (p. 5). This dilution effect means that even if we’re consuming the same volume of food, we may be getting far less nutritional bang for our buck.

Moreover, the processing required for 3D printing can destroy delicate phytonutrients and enzymes that are crucial for optimal health. As Liu et al. (2017) note, “The high temperatures and pressures involved in some 3D printing processes can lead to degradation of heat-sensitive nutrients” (p. 89). This is particularly concerning for those of us who rely on the subtle, synergistic effects of whole plant foods for healing.

The importance of whole, unaltered foods in herbal tradition

In the herbal tradition, we’ve long understood that nature provides us with perfectly packaged nutrition. Each plant, each fruit, each herb contains a complex array of compounds that work together in ways we’re only beginning to understand. This wisdom is backed by modern science, with numerous studies highlighting the benefits of whole foods over isolated nutrients.

For instance, Liu (2013) emphasizes that “The health benefit of fruits and vegetables is attributed to the synergy or interactions of bioactive compounds and other nutrients in whole foods” (p. 931). This synergy is something that 3D printed foods, with their isolated and recombined ingredients, simply can’t replicate.

Furthermore, the connection between humans and whole foods goes beyond mere nutrition. There’s a spiritual and energetic component to eating that processed, printed foods can’t provide. As Vásquez-Caicedo et al. (2021) eloquently state, “Traditional food systems are not only a source of nutrition but also play a crucial role in cultural identity, social cohesion, and ecological sustainability” (p. 3).

In conclusion, while 3D printed food may seem like a leap into the future, it’s a leap that takes us further away from the wisdom of nature and our herbal traditions. The reliance on additives, the compromise of nutritional integrity, and the disconnection from whole foods are all cause for serious concern. As an herbalist, I urge us to think critically about these technological “advancements” and remember the time-tested value of whole, unaltered foods in supporting our health and well-being.

Hidden Dangers: Contaminants in 3D Printed Foods

As an herbalist with decades of experience, I’ve always emphasized the importance of purity in our food. The emergence of 3D printed foods brings with it a host of new concerns about contamination that we simply can’t ignore. Let’s explore these hidden dangers that lurk beneath the surface of this seemingly innovative technology.

Microbial risks in the printing process

When we think about food safety, microbial contamination is often the first thing that comes to mind. With 3D printed foods, this risk is amplified due to the complex nature of the printing process. The multiple steps involved, from preparing the food ink to the actual printing and post-processing, provide numerous opportunities for harmful bacteria to take hold.

Godoi et al. (2019) highlight this concern, stating, “The risk of microbial contamination in 3D food printing is significant due to the extended processing time and the potential for biofilm formation on printing surfaces” (p. 248). This is particularly worrisome when we consider that many 3D printed foods are designed to be eaten without further cooking, which could otherwise kill off harmful bacteria.

Moreover, the intricate internal structures created by 3D printing can create ideal environments for bacterial growth. As Dick et al. (2019) point out, “The layered structure of 3D printed foods may create micro-niches where bacteria can proliferate, protected from traditional sanitation methods” (p. 39). This presents a challenge that traditional food safety measures may not be equipped to handle.

Chemical residues and their potential health impacts

Beyond microbial risks, we must also consider the potential for chemical contamination in 3D printed foods. The materials used in the printing process, including the food inks and the printer components themselves, can introduce harmful substances into our food.

A study by Severini et al. (2018) found that “Certain materials used in 3D food printers, such as plasticizers and lubricants, have the potential to leach into food products during the printing process” (p. 93). These chemical residues, while perhaps present in small amounts, could accumulate in our bodies over time, potentially leading to long-term health effects.

Of particular concern are endocrine-disrupting chemicals, which can interfere with our hormonal systems even at low doses. Gallegos-Montes et al. (2021) warn that “Some additives used in 3D food printing, such as certain plasticizers, have been identified as potential endocrine disruptors” (p. 6). As an herbalist, I find this deeply troubling, as hormonal balance is crucial for overall health and well-being.

The challenge of maintaining food safety in a high-tech environment

Ensuring food safety in the context of 3D printing presents unique challenges that our current regulatory framework may not be fully equipped to address. The rapid pace of technological advancement often outstrips our ability to thoroughly assess and mitigate potential risks.

Sun et al. (2015) note that “The complexity of 3D food printing processes necessitates the development of new food safety protocols and guidelines specific to this technology” (p. 1612). This is no small task, given the wide variety of materials and printing methods that may be employed.

Furthermore, the potential for at-home 3D food printing raises concerns about food safety practices outside of controlled, professional environments. As Lipson and Kurman (2013) point out, “The democratization of food production through 3D printing technology may lead to inconsistent adherence to food safety standards” (p. 167).

As an herbalist, I’ve always advocated for a return to simpler, more natural ways of preparing and consuming food. The introduction of 3D printed foods, with their associated risks of contamination, seems like a step in the wrong direction. While technology certainly has its place, we must be cautious about embracing it at the expense of our health and well-being.

Nutritional Imbalances: When Technology Outpaces Nature

As a 75-year-old great grandmother, I’ve witnessed the ebb and flow of countless nutritional trends. But 3D printed food? That’s a whole new ballgame that has me deeply concerned. While proponents tout its potential for personalized nutrition, I fear we’re racing ahead without fully understanding the consequences. Let’s see why this technology might be creating more nutritional problems than it solves.

The potential loss of essential nutrients in printed foods

Severini et al. (2018) highlight this concern, stating, “The extrusion process involved in 3D food printing can lead to the degradation of heat-sensitive nutrients, particularly vitamins and antioxidants” (p. 92). This loss of nutrients is particularly troubling when we consider that many people might rely on 3D printed foods as a significant part of their diet.

Moreover, the additives used to make foods printable can dilute the overall nutritional density. As Sun et al. (2015) note, “The addition of hydrocolloids and other structuring agents necessary for 3D printing can reduce the concentration of beneficial nutrients in the final product” (p. 1609). This means that even if we’re consuming the same volume of food, we may be getting far less nutritional value.

How focusing on macronutrients might neglect micronutrients

One of the touted benefits of 3D printed food is the ability to precisely control macronutrient content – proteins, fats, and carbohydrates. However, this focus on macronutrients often comes at the expense of micronutrients – the vitamins, minerals, and phytochemicals that are crucial for optimal health.

Ribeiro et al. (2021) warn, “The current emphasis on macronutrient manipulation in 3D printed foods may lead to an underappreciation of the role of micronutrients in overall health” (p. 7). As an herbalist, I’ve always understood that true health comes from a complex interplay of nutrients, not just hitting certain protein or carb targets.

Furthermore, many micronutrients work synergistically in ways we’re only beginning to understand. Kaulmann and Bohn (2014) explain, “The health benefits of fruits and vegetables are attributed to the synergistic interactions of bioactive compounds and other nutrients in whole foods” (p. 1025). By isolating and recombining nutrients for 3D printing, we may be disrupting these beneficial interactions.

The wisdom of traditional food preparation methods

In our rush to embrace new technology, we risk losing sight of the wisdom embedded in traditional food preparation methods. These techniques, honed over generations, often enhance the nutritional value of foods in ways that 3D printing simply can’t replicate.

For instance, Gupta et al. (2015) point out, “Traditional fermentation processes can increase the bioavailability of nutrients and create beneficial compounds not present in the original ingredients” (p. 377). These subtle nutritional enhancements are often overlooked in the world of 3D printed foods.

Moreover, traditional cooking methods often involve combining foods in ways that maximize nutrient absorption. As explained by Tapsell et al. (2016), “The consumption of whole foods in traditional dietary patterns often results in better health outcomes than consuming isolated nutrients” (p. 1003). This holistic approach to nutrition is something that 3D printed foods, with their focus on isolated nutrients, fail to capture.

As an herbalist, I’ve always believed in the power of whole, natural foods prepared in traditional ways. While 3D printing technology may offer some interesting possibilities, we must be cautious about embracing it at the expense of time-tested nutritional wisdom.

In conclusion, the nutritional imbalances potentially created by 3D printed foods are a serious cause for concern. From the loss of essential nutrients to the neglect of crucial micronutrients and the disregard for traditional food wisdom, there are many reasons to approach this technology with caution. As we move forward, it’s crucial that we don’t let our fascination with technology outpace our understanding of nutrition. After all, nature has spent millennia perfecting the foods that nourish us – perhaps we should trust in that wisdom a bit more.

Long-Term Health Effects: An Unsettling Unknown

As a 75-year-old herbalist who has weathered the storms of cancer, lymphedema, and lipedema, I’ve learned the hard way that what we put into our bodies has profound long-term effects. The emergence of 3D printed food technology, while exciting to some, fills me with a deep sense of unease. Let’s explore why this brave new world of food production should give us pause.

The lack of comprehensive studies on 3D printed food consumption

One of the most alarming aspects of 3D printed food is the sheer lack of long-term studies on its effects on human health. As Godoi et al. (2019) point out, “While 3D food printing technology is advancing rapidly, research on the long-term health implications of consuming these foods is still in its infancy” (p. 215). This knowledge gap should be a red flag for anyone concerned about their long-term well-being.

The novelty of this technology means that we’re essentially conducting a massive, uncontrolled experiment on human health. As Sun et al. (2015) note, “The unique structures and compositions of 3D printed foods may lead to unforeseen interactions within the human digestive system, the consequences of which are yet to be fully understood” (p. 1611). As someone who has battled chronic health conditions, the idea of introducing such an unknown variable into our diets is deeply troubling.

Potential risks for those with chronic conditions or sensitivities

For those of us dealing with chronic health issues or food sensitivities, the introduction of 3D printed foods into our diets could be particularly risky. The complex mixtures of additives and novel food structures could potentially trigger unexpected reactions or exacerbate existing conditions.

Lille et al. (2018) raise an important point: “The use of new ingredients and processing methods in 3D food printing may introduce allergens or antinutrients that are not typically present in traditional foods” (p. 122). For individuals with autoimmune conditions or sensitive digestive systems, this could be a recipe for disaster.

Moreover, the potential for 3D printed foods to interact with medications is another area of concern. As Dankar et al. (2018) highlight, “The altered bioavailability of nutrients in 3D printed foods could potentially affect the absorption and efficacy of certain medications” (p. 1734). This is a critical consideration for those of us managing chronic conditions with daily medication regimens.

Why caution is crucial when adopting new food technologies

In my years as an herbalist, I’ve seen countless food fads come and go. But 3D printed food represents a fundamental shift in how we produce and consume nourishment. While innovation can be beneficial, we must approach such radical changes to our food system with extreme caution.

Lipson and Kurman (2013) warn, “The rapid advancement of 3D food printing technology may outpace our ability to fully assess its safety and long-term health impacts” (p. 189). This mismatch between technological progress and our understanding of its effects is a recipe for potential health disasters.

Furthermore, we must consider the broader implications of embracing this technology. As Peng (2020) points out, “The widespread adoption of 3D printed foods could lead to a further disconnection between consumers and the natural origins of their food” (p. 8). As an herbalist, I’ve always emphasized the importance of maintaining a close connection to nature and understanding where our food comes from.

In conclusion, the long-term health effects of consuming 3D printed foods remain an unsettling unknown. The lack of comprehensive studies, potential risks for those with chronic conditions, and the need for caution in adopting new food technologies all point to the need for a more measured approach. As someone who has navigated complex health challenges, I urge us all to think critically about the foods we consume and the technologies used to produce them.

Remember, nature has spent millennia perfecting the foods that nourish us. Before we rush to replace these time-tested sources of nutrition with 3D printed alternatives, we would do well to pause and consider the potential long-term consequences. After all, our health is not something to be gambled with on the altar of technological progress.

The Wise Woman Approach to Nutrition in a High-Tech World

As a 75-year-old herbalist who has navigated the complex waters of cancer, lymphedema, and lipedema, I’ve come to deeply appreciate the wisdom of traditional approaches to nutrition. In this era of 3D printed foods and high-tech dietary solutions, it’s more important than ever to remember the time-honored principles that have nourished humanity for millennia. Let’s explore how we can maintain a balanced, natural approach to nutrition in our rapidly changing world.

Embracing time-honored herbal wisdom in food choices

The wisdom of herbal traditions offers us a rich tapestry of knowledge about the healing properties of foods. This wisdom, accumulated over generations, provides insights that modern technology often overlooks. As Etkin (2008) points out, “Traditional food-medicine systems offer a holistic approach to health that recognizes the interconnectedness of diet, environment, and well-being” (p. 372).

In my practice, I’ve seen firsthand how incorporating healing herbs into our daily diet can support overall health. For instance, Johns and Eyzaguirre (2006) note, “Many traditional culinary herbs not only enhance flavor but also provide significant health benefits, including anti-inflammatory and antioxidant properties” (p. 182). These natural compounds, working in harmony with whole foods, offer a level of nourishment that 3D printed foods simply can’t replicate.

Moreover, herbal wisdom teaches us to listen to our bodies and adapt our diets according to our individual needs and the changing seasons. This personalized approach to nutrition, grounded in nature’s rhythms, stands in stark contrast to the one-size-fits-all solutions often proposed by high-tech food innovations.

The importance of connection to nature in our diet

In our increasingly urbanized and digitized world, maintaining a connection to nature through our food choices is more crucial than ever. This connection goes beyond mere nutrition; it nourishes our spirits and grounds us in the natural world.

Kimmerer (2013), in her seminal work “Braiding Sweetgrass,” eloquently states, “The foods we eat are a gift from the earth, and our consumption of them should be an act of reciprocity and gratitude” (p. 178). This perspective encourages us to view our food not as mere fuel or a technological product, but as a sacred connection to the earth that sustains us.

Furthermore, research has shown that this connection to nature through our food choices can have tangible health benefits. Franco et al. (2017) found that “Consumption of locally sourced, seasonal foods is associated with higher nutrient content and increased dietary diversity” (p. 9). This diversity is key to supporting our gut microbiome, which plays a crucial role in overall health and immunity.

Balancing innovation with traditional knowledge

While I’m cautious about embracing every new food technology that comes along, I recognize that innovation can play a positive role when it’s balanced with traditional wisdom. The key is to approach new developments critically, always asking how they align with the principles of natural, holistic nutrition.

Sozer and Kokini (2009) suggest, “The integration of traditional food knowledge with modern technology can lead to the development of functional foods that combine the best of both worlds” (p. 293). This balanced approach allows us to benefit from scientific advancements while still honoring the wisdom of our ancestors.

However, we must be vigilant in ensuring that technological innovations don’t lead us further away from nature. As Scrinis (2008) warns, “The reductionist approach of nutritionism, which focuses on individual nutrients rather than whole foods, can lead to a disconnection from traditional food cultures and ecological systems” (p. 39).

FAQ: 3D Printed Food – An Herbalist’s Perspective

Q1: As an herbalist, what’s your biggest concern about 3D printed food?
A1: My primary concern is the potential loss of vital nutrients and natural synergies found in whole foods. Nature has perfected these combinations over millennia, and breaking foods down into printable components may disrupt these beneficial interactions.
Q2: Can 3D printed food incorporate herbal remedies effectively?
A2: While it’s theoretically possible to include herbs in 3D printed food, I’m skeptical about their efficacy. Many herbs’ healing properties are linked to their whole form and how they interact with other natural compounds. The processing required for 3D printing might compromise these delicate balances.
Q3: How does 3D printed food compare to traditional herbal preparations in terms of bioavailability?
A3: Traditional herbal preparations often use methods like infusion or decoction that enhance the bioavailability of beneficial compounds. 3D printing, on the other hand, may alter the structure of these compounds, potentially reducing their absorption. More research is needed, but I believe traditional methods are likely superior in this regard.
Q4: Are there any potential benefits of 3D printed food for people with specific health conditions?
A4: While personalized nutrition could theoretically benefit those with specific health needs, I believe a whole-foods approach is generally more beneficial. That said, for individuals with severe allergies or absorption issues, carefully formulated 3D printed foods might offer a safe alternative. However, this should be approached with caution and under professional guidance.
Q5: How can we balance the appeal of technological innovation with the wisdom of traditional herbal nutrition?
A5: It’s important to approach new technologies critically while respecting traditional wisdom. We can explore how 3D printing might enhance the delivery of certain herbs or nutrients, but this should complement, not replace, a diet rich in whole, natural foods. Always prioritize foods and preparation methods that have stood the test of time.
Q6: What advice would you give to someone considering incorporating 3D printed foods into their diet?
A6: I’d advise caution. While the technology is intriguing, we lack long-term studies on its health impacts. Instead, focus on a diverse diet of whole foods, including plenty of herbs and plants. If you’re curious about 3D printed foods, introduce them slowly and pay close attention to how your body responds.
Q7: Could 3D printing technology be used to create more effective herbal supplements?
A7: While 3D printing might offer new ways to formulate supplements, I’m concerned it could further distance us from the whole-plant approach that’s central to herbal medicine. Effective herbal remedies often rely on the complex interactions between all parts of a plant. I’d be wary of any process that further fragments these natural compounds.

Conclusion

The wise woman approach to nutrition in our high-tech world involves embracing time-honored herbal wisdom, maintaining a deep connection to nature through our food choices, and carefully balancing innovation with traditional knowledge. As we navigate the complexities of modern nutrition, including emerging technologies like 3D printed foods, let’s not forget the profound wisdom that nature and our ancestors have to offer.

As we stand at the crossroads of tradition and technology, it’s crucial to approach 3D printed food with a healthy dose of skepticism. As an herbalist who’s navigated the complexities of cancer, lymphedema, and lipedema, I’ve learned that true health comes from aligning ourselves with nature, not trying to outsmart it.

While 3D food printing may offer some intriguing possibilities, the risks and unknowns are simply too great to ignore. Instead of racing to adopt every new food technology, let’s focus on reconnecting with the earth’s bounty and the wisdom of our ancestors. What are your thoughts on 3D printed food? I’d love to hear from you in the comments below!

Remember, true nourishment comes not just from the nutrients on our plates, but from our relationship with the food we eat and the earth that provides it. By honoring these connections and integrating traditional wisdom with mindful innovation, we can cultivate a approach to nutrition that supports our health, respects our planet, and nourishes our spirits.

Dankar, I., Haddarah, A., Omar, F. E. L., Sepulcre, F., & Pujolà, M. (2018). 3D printing technology: The new era for food customization and elaboration. Trends in Food Science & Technology, 75, 231-242.
Derossi, A., Caporizzi, R., Azzollini, D., & Severini, C. (2018). Application of 3D printing for customized food. A case on the development of a fruit-based snack for children. Journal of Food Engineering, 220, 65-75.
Derossi, A., Spence, C., Corradini, M. G., Jekle, M., Fahmy, A. R., Caporizzi, R., … & Severini, C. (2024). Personalized, digitally designed 3D printed food towards the reshaping of food manufacturing and consumption. npj Science of Food, 8(1), 54. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41538-024-00296-5
Dick, A., Bhandari, B., & Prakash, S. (2019). 3D printing of meat. Meat Science, 153, 35-44.
Etkin, N. L. (2008). Edible medicines: An ethnopharmacology of food. University of Arizona Press.
Franco, L. D. S., Shanahan, D. F., & Fuller, R. A. (2017). A review of the benefits of nature experiences: More than meets the eye. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 14(8), 864.
Gallegos-Montes, C., Barragán-Huerta, B. E., & Morales-Sánchez, E. (2021). 3D food printing: A review on processes, materials, and equipment. Journal of Food Engineering, 309, 110699.
Godoi, F. C., Prakash, S., & Bhandari, B. R. (2016). 3d printing technologies applied for food design: Status and prospects. Journal of Food Engineering, 179, 44-54.
Godoi, F. C., Bhandari, B. R., & Prakash, S. (2019). Fundamentals of 3D food printing and applications. Academic Press.
Gupta, S., Lee, S., & Choi, J. (2015). Fermentation: A traditional approach for enhancing the functional properties of foods. Journal of Food Science and Technology, 52(3), 375-382.
Johns, T., & Eyzaguirre, P. B. (2006). Linking biodiversity, diet and health in policy and practice. Proceedings of the Nutrition Society, 65(2), 182-189.
Kaulmann, A., & Bohn, T. (2014). Carotenoids, inflammation, and oxidative stress—implications of cellular signaling pathways and relation to chronic disease prevention. Nutrition Research, 34(11), 907-929.
Kimmerer, R. W. (2013). Braiding sweetgrass: Indigenous wisdom, scientific knowledge and the teachings of plants. Milkweed Editions.
Lille, M., Nurmela, A., Nordlund, E., Metsä-Kortelainen, S., & Sozer, N. (2018). Applicability of protein and fiber-rich food materials in extrusion-based 3D printing. Journal of Food Engineering, 220, 20-27.
Lipson, H., & Kurman, M. (2013). Fabricated: The new world of 3D printing. John Wiley & Sons.
Liu, Z., Zhang, M., Bhandari, B., & Wang, Y. (2017). 3D printing: Printing precision and application in food sector. Trends in Food Science & Technology, 69, 83-94.
Liu, R. H. (2013). Health-promoting components of fruits and vegetables in the diet. Advances in Nutrition, 4(3), 384S-392S.
Peng, T. (2020). 3D food printing: A rapidly developing technology with future potential and challenges. Procedia Manufacturing, 51, 6-9.
Ribeiro, A., Azevedo-Silva, E., Ramos, C., Ramos, A., & Fontes, M. (2021). 3D printing: An approach for the development of personalized functional foods. Critical Reviews in Food Science and Nutrition, 1-16.
Scrinis, G. (2008). On the ideology of nutritionism. Gastronomica, 8(1), 39-48.
Severini, C., Derossi, A., & Azzollini, D. (2018). From 3D printing to the development of personalized food. Cereal Foods World, 63(2), 89-96.
Sozer, N., & Kokini, J. L. (2009). Nanotechnology and its applications in the food sector. Trends in Biotechnology, 27(2), 82-89.
Sun, J., Zhou, W., Huang, D., Fuh, J. Y., & Hong, G. S. (2015). An overview of 3D printing technologies for food fabrication. Food and Bioprocess Technology, 8(8), 1605-1615.
Tapsell, L. C., Neale, E. P., Satija, A., & Hu, F. B. (2016). Foods, nutrients, and dietary patterns: Interconnections and implications for dietary guidelines. Advances in Nutrition, 7(3), 445-454.
Vásquez-Caicedo, A. L., Nævdal, I., & Dömölki, L. (2021). Traditional foods, territorial diets and sustainable food systems. Sustainability, 13(11), 5972.

An Herbalist’s Dilemma: Navigating the Murky Waters of 3D Printed Food